🔗 Share this article

Throughout the previous presidential campaign, Donald Trump wooed the electorate with promises to reduce prices immediately upon taking office. But, once his inauguration, there was minimal attention to the cost of living. All that changed following inflation-weary voters expressed dissatisfaction at the polls. Shortly thereafter, his team initiated a hastily assembled effort to address affordability. Regrettably, the drive has proven a hot mess—characterized by absurdity, contradictions, magical thinking, blame-shifting, and Trumpian dishonesty.

Detached Assertions and Supermarket Reality

Just two days after the election, the president began his affordability drive with a disastrous statement: “Food prices are way down. All items is way down… So I don’t want to hear about the cost of living.” This comment from the wealthy leader—who frequently mingles with other ultra-rich individuals—revealed utter contempt for millions of Americans who struggle when visiting supermarkets. Essentially, he ignored their struggles as unimportant, implying they had it wrong about actual costs.

His assertion about declining prices proved highly misleading and dishonest. In what way could every price be falling when his cherished tariffs were pushing up costs? Official statistics show the cost of bananas rose 6.9% over the past year, beef prices climbed 14.7%, and coffee prices surged by nearly 19%—in part due to import taxes applied to Brazilian products. In the first three quarters, prices rose in five of the six main grocery groups monitored by the Consumer Price Index, including animal proteins (up 4.5%), drinks (increasing nearly 3%), and fruits and vegetables (up 1.3%).

Inconsistencies and Inaccuracies in Economic Claims

Despite these numbers, Trump continues to push his misleading narrative about lower costs. After the vote, he has claimed there is “almost no price increases,” insisted “costs have fallen significantly,” and asserted “it is far less expensive under Trump than it was under sleepy Joe Biden.” Such remarks contradict the fact that prices overall have clearly increased after the previous administration. Currently, price growth is running at a 3% annual rate, that’s 50% higher than the central bank’s 2% goal. In another falsehood, he claimed that gas prices had dropped to nearly $2 a gallon, even though official data show they average $3.19.

Confronted by reality and lower approval ratings, advisers evidently cautioned that his “prices are down” rhetoric made him sound disconnected from ordinary people. Many citizens are frustrated about prices continuing to climb following assurances of reductions. In response, advisers suggested one quick fix: roll back certain import taxes. The logical move clashed with Trump’s absurd assertion that additional taxes would not increase costs for US consumers.

Proposed Solutions and Their Possible Impact

As some tariffs being rolled back on several food items, Trump will probably claim that he has cut prices once these products start declining in price. This would be like an arsonist taking credit for putting out a fire that he had started. In another instance, when addressing McDonald’s executives, he declared that “this is the peak period of America” and told the audience that “costs are decreasing and all of that stuff.” These comments are easy for a wealthy individual to make, but they ring hollow to countless households who are struggling—particularly when many risk losing food stamps or skyrocketing health premiums.

According to a survey conducted last fall, three-quarters of respondents believe the state of the economy are mediocre or bad, while just a quarter rate them good or excellent. Another poll showed that 61% of Americans say the administration’s actions have “worsened economic conditions” in the country.

Economic Reality and Suggested Measures

Scott Bessent, Trump’s top economic official, recently disputed assertions of a golden age. He noted that far from booming, some parts of the American economy “have contracted.” Industrial production—a priority for the administration—appears to have contracted for multiple consecutive months and shed approximately tens of thousands of positions this year. Pointing to this weakness, Bessent urged the central bank to reduce borrowing costs—a move that could help affordability.

In response to public dismay about affordability, Trump suggested a cash handout of “a payout of at least $2,000 a person” excluding “the wealthy.” For many struggling Americans, it seems like a financial lifeline, but the prospects are dim that Congress—already alarmed about huge budget deficits—will enact such a plan. The scheme would likely raise government expenditure, push up borrowing costs, and possibly fuel inflation by putting more money into the economy.

Another proposed solution for affordability involved creating half-century home loans, with the notion that this would reduce monthly mortgage payments. However, the truth is that such lengthy loans have minimal impact to reduce installments—often reducing them by a small amount per month. The drawback is that these loans could more than double the total interest homeowners pay and slow their accumulation of equity.

Blaming the Past Government and Economic Outlook

In their affordability campaign, Trump and his team have again pointed fingers at the previous president for economic problems, including increasing costs. Spokespeople stated they “faced a mess from Joe Biden” and were “cleaning up the prior administration’s price hikes.” This is absurd and untruthful allegations. In reality, Biden left a strong economy, with low price growth, economic growth strong, and unemployment low. But, the current administration’s actions—particularly import taxes—have resulted in an economic mess, driving costs higher and reducing economic output.

According to an economist, lead analyst at Moody’s Analytics, 22 states are experiencing economic decline, with their conditions worsened by the administration’s trade policies. He worries that if key regions like California and New York enter a downturn, the US could slide into a broad economic slump. During recessions, consumers typically have less money to spend, and inflation often falls. Unfortunately, given the highly-touted affordability campaign likely to do little to control costs, his most effective “tool” for improving living standards might prove to be pushing the nation into recession—a scenario that struggling Americans really can’t afford.